Intended for healthcare professionals

Editorials

League tables for the NHS

BMJ 2024; 387 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2606 (Published 22 November 2024) Cite this as: BMJ 2024;387:q2606
  1. Nigel Edwards, honorary visiting professor1,
  2. Mark Dayan, head of public affairs2
  1. 1Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  2. 2Nuffield Trust, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to: N Edwards nigel_edwards{at}btopenworld.com

Measures of performance need to be meaningful

The secretary of state for health and social care, Wes Streeting, has announced NHS league tables to guarantee “no more rewards for failure” in UK healthcare.1 Under the plan, the worst performing hospitals would have turnaround teams installed and managers sacked, while the best would have more freedom to invest capital.2

This package of measures mirrors the policy approach of the early 2000s. A wealth of evidence from that period suggests this is no easy fix.3 Designing a ranking that is fair and accurate for organisations as huge and complicated as NHS trusts is difficult. Star ratings in the 2000s saw repeated cycles of a crisis of confidence before major revisions and improvements were made.4

Goodhart’s law states that once a measure becomes a target, it stops being a good measure, as managers find ways to hit the target without making anything better.5 Ambulance trusts under star ratings would delay starting the clock for waits and recategorise calls so that standards were …

View Full Text

Log in

Log in through your institution

Subscribe

* For online subscription