Commentary: The real problem is that electronic health records focus too much on billing
BMJ 2017; 356 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j326 (Published 24 January 2017) Cite this as: BMJ 2017;356:j326- Jeanne Lenzer, associate editor, The BMJ
- jlenzer{at}bmj.com
Advocates say that electronic health records increase patient safety through computerized prescriber order entry and integration of decision supports and guidelines. They also vastly increase opportunities for clinical research using “big data.”123
But critics, like Steven J Stack, the immediate past president of the American Medical Association (AMA), are unconvinced. Stack writes that electronic records “have so much potential, but frustrating government regulations have made them almost unusable,” adding that they were expected to “help facilitate patient engagement, reduce administrative burdens and promote exchange of data.” But those benefits, he said, “definitely” haven’t happened.4
A recent time-motion study sponsored by the AMA found that “For every hour physicians provide direct clinical face …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.