Intended for healthcare professionals

CCBYNC Open access
Analysis Unmet needs for chronic diseases in China

Bridging the digital divide to promote prevention and control of non-communicable diseases for all in China and beyond

BMJ 2024; 387 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-076768 (Published 18 October 2024) Cite this as: BMJ 2024;387:e076768

Read the collection: Unmet needs for chronic diseases in China

  1. Enying Gong, associate researcher1 2,
  2. Hui Wang, professor3,
  3. Weiguo Zhu, chief physician4 5,
  4. Gauden Galea, strategic advisor6,
  5. Jian Xu, chief physician7,
  6. Lijing L Yan, professor8 9,
  7. Ruitai Shao, distinguished professor1 2
  1. 1School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
  2. 2State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
  3. 3School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 20025, China
  4. 4Department of Primary Care and Family Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
  5. 5Department of Medical Insurance Management, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
  6. 6World Health Organization Representative Office in China, Beijing, China
  7. 7Department of Elderly Health Management, Shenzhen Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, China
  8. 8Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China
  9. 9Peking University Institute for Global Health and Development, Beijing, China
  1. Correspondence to: R Shao shaoruitai{at}cams.cn

Ruitai Shao and colleagues argue that the digital divide may exacerbate global disparities in prevention and control of non-communicable diseases and enlarge health inequity when effective digital health solutions are unevenly distributed

Digital health can be broadly defined as an umbrella term referring to the systematic application of information and communication technologies, smart and wearable devices, computer sciences, and electronic data for health purposes.1 This evolving field spans telemedicine, mobile health, electronic health records and big data, wearable devices, artificial intelligence, and so on, empowering patients, healthcare providers, and health system managers.2 Many studies have highlighted the great potential of digital health solutions in overcoming barriers to accessing healthcare and facilitating the management of non-communicable diseases.3 Recognised as pivotal innovations and public goods, digital health solutions have been increasingly adopted globally, including in China, with the commitment to achieving sustainable development goals by advancing universal health coverage and improving prevention and control of non-communicable diseases.14

However, as with any innovation, digital health solutions have emerged along with risks and bottlenecks, such as concerns about privacy, data security, and high investment cost. Of these concerns, special consideration is warranted for the digital divide, reflected as the uneven global distribution of information and communication technologies. The digital divide raises concerns about health inequities, as disadvantaged populations remain disconnected from the digital world and are excluded from sharing its benefits. Although this challenge affects the prevention and control of both infectious diseases and non-communicable diseases, the enduring impact on non-communicable diseases warrants special attention. In this paper, we present existing evidence on digital health for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases, illustrate the multifaceted effects of the digital divide on disparities in non-communicable disease outcomes, showcase strategies implemented in China to correct the digital divide, and propose future directions for maximising the collective value of digital health solutions to promote health for all.

Leveraging digital health across the continuum of care for non-communicable diseases

Digital health solutions have emerged as transformative tools in healthcare, holding the promise to enhance the continuum of care for non-communicable diseases. Despite heterogeneity in design and effectiveness, a growing number of reviews show the benefits of digital health solutions in preventing and managing non-communicable diseases, across the care continuum (as depicted in figure 1), from health promotion and prevention,5 through diagnosis, treatment,3 and long term control,67 to rehabilitation.8 Interestingly, the focus of digital health solutions varied among the four major non-communicable diseases represented in the global agenda for their prevention and control. Modest evidence highlights the beneficial role of digital health solutions in lifestyle modifications and self-management support for hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases67; however, the evidence leans more towards active treatment and survivorship support for cancer,9 as well as personal physiological monitoring for the chronic respiratory diseases.10

Fig 1
Fig 1

Potential benefit of digital health on the continuum of care for non-communicable diseases (NCDs)

Moreover, digital health solutions are increasingly recognised as tools to tackle healthcare system challenges and improve universal health coverage. Telemedicine, for instance, plays a distinctive role in mitigating barriers to accessing healthcare services by extending care and health consultation to remote areas. Evolving evidence suggests that digital health solutions, enabled by electronic medical records, big data, and artificial intelligence, can enhance the efficiency of healthcare systems and bolster population level surveillance and management of non-communicable diseases.11

Emerging challenges of the digital divide caused by the irreversible trend of digitalisation

No doubt exists about the ongoing trend of digitalisation in healthcare in this information era. By 2021 global mobile cellular subscriptions per 100 people had increased to 107 from 76 in 2010, with a doubling from 64 per 100 people in 2010 to 122 in 2021 in China.12 Additionally, about 300 000 health and wellness mobile apps are available worldwide.13 The covid-19 pandemic acted as a catalyst, accelerating the global embracement of digital health solutions, and this transformation is expected to be irreversible post-pandemic. Nevertheless, increasing evidence indicates that the scale and speed of digitalisation has varied across settings and among different populations,1415 leaving the problem of a digital divide. For instance, a post-pandemic national survey in the US showed a sustained increase in internet usage and almost doubling of the likelihood of electronic communication with healthcare providers, with notably higher growth observed among more highly educated groups.16

The digital divide was originally conceptualised as disparities in accessibility of modern information and communication technologies across demographics and regions, and it has now been further delineated into three tiers of digital access, digital literacy, and digital assimilation.15 Digital access is obvious, manifesting as unequal access to the internet and mobile subscriptions across population groups. Notably, women, older people, and those with lower socioeconomic status experience relatively limited access to information and communication technologies, and such gaps are more pronounced in low and middle income countries.171819 The second and third tiers of the digital divide refer to varying levels of digital literacy and engagement, especially prominent among older people. Despite greater health needs and potential benefits, older people face complex and multifaceted barriers in engaging with digital health solutions, including declines in sensory and functional abilities, learning curves in adoption, lack of motivation to change, and inadequate supporting environments.202122 These three tiers of the digital divide highlight disparities in the accessibility, adoption, and utilisation of digital health solutions and are misaligned with the goals of equitable spread of innovations.

Will the digital divide exacerbate health disparities in prevention and control of non-communicable diseases?

The potential exists to narrow health disparities through digital health innovations, if digital health technologies are harnessed effectively to overcome major barriers in health equity and deployed widely to all disadvantaged populations. Telemedicine, for instance, plays a pivotal role in diminishing health disparities by overcoming geographical barriers and ensuring that people in underserved and remote areas receive timely and equitable medical care.

However, in reality, digital health innovations have evolved disproportionately at a rapid speed, incapable of resolving all challenges plaguing fractured healthcare systems or underlining inequities. Although difficult to measure systematically, wider gaps in the provision of digital health solutions have been observed,161819 translating into increasing health inequities across populations and settings. The first two columns of table 1 summarise the manifestation of the digital divide and its potential intermediate and long term effects on the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases from three perspectives: the individual level, the healthcare providers and institutional level, and the societal and global perspective.

Table 1

Effects of digital divide on prevention and control of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and potential compensatory measures

View this table:

At the individual level, the digital divide intertwines with demographic and social factors, such as gender, age, and poverty, recognised as the “causes of causes” of health inequity.23 In resonance with the principles of the “inverse care law,”24 people with fewer resources need more but receive fewer digital health solutions. Beyond grappling with the root causes of non-communicable diseases, they confront additional impediments, including limited awareness of innovations and lower capacity to utilise timely and convenient support facilitated by digital health solutions.15 Moreover, the under-representation of disadvantaged groups in the research and development of digital health solutions engenders inequities in the acquisition of health related big data, introducing bias that hampers overall effectiveness.14 This unequal access and imbalanced effectiveness amplify the pre-existing disparities in mobility, disability, and mortality caused by non-communicable diseases.

Among healthcare providers and institutions, the digital divide is evident in varying levels of adoption and integration of digital health solutions in clinical settings, potentially affecting the efficiency and quality of care delivery for non-communicable diseases. Reviews highlight the heterogeneous nature of trust, digital literacy, and adoption behaviours among healthcare providers, closely linked to clinical decision making performance and patient centred care delivery for non-communicable diseases.25 Notably, the velocity of digitalisation varies across institutions, reflected as divergence in the adoption and integration of major health information systems, such as electronic health records and decision support systems. Institutions with limited resources lag in this transformation, owing to financial constraints, inadequate infrastructure, limited leadership motivations, and low provider capacities.15182627 Such uneven institution level adoption of digital health solutions may affect the efficiency of supply chain and workflow management, which underpins service delivery for non-communicable diseases.

The digital divide may also exacerbate the existing global disparity in the burden of non-communicable diseases across countries. The global fight against non-communicable diseases is marked by considerable disparities, with about 80% of premature deaths related to non-communicable diseases occurring in low and middle income countries.28 Substantial barriers to infrastructure, financial investment, and policy environment hinder low and middle income countries from implementing non-communicable disease related digital public health practices, as well as digitalised surveillance and monitoring platforms.2223 In a vicious circle, the scarcity of evidence poses additional concerns for policy making, slowing down the integration of digital health solutions into the national non-communicable disease agenda.

Bridging the digital divide to promote prevention and control of non-communicable diseases for all: lessons from China

Given the inevitable impact of the digital divide on disparities in non-communicable diseases, identifying key strategies to diminish its negative effect on health inequities is crucial. Enhancing digital inclusion, a focal point to propel global digital health strategies,2930 is crucial for alleviating the disproportionate burden of non-communicable diseases among disadvantaged populations. Effective solutions to tackle each level of digital divide, summarised in table 1 (last column), are validated in studies, recommended by guidelines, or implemented in various settings.43031 China, as a key player leading the embracement and innovation of digitalisation, has significantly narrowed the extent of digital divide. Several impactful initiatives to enhance digital inclusion, detailed in box 1, have effectively improved digital inclusion in China. Notably, the gender parity score, calculated as the proportion of women who use the internet compared with men, has improved from 0.8 in 2014 to 0.95 in 2022. People aged 60 years and above accounted for 14.3% of netizens by the end of 2022, a substantial increase from 2.1% in mid-2014.12

Box 1

Major strategies in China for bridging the digital divide and promoting NCD prevention and control

Tackling barriers to digital access

  • Expanding broadband networks in remote settings and increasing internet penetration rates to improve the accessibility of digital devices and the internet.12 This includes efforts to bridge the urban-rural divide and ensure connectivity in underserved areas

  • Overcoming financial barriers to adoption of virtual care by releasing medical reimbursement regulations that supported online consultations for NCDs during the covid-19 pandemic

Tackling barriers to digital literacy

  • Enhancing the awareness, capacity, and skills of patients with NCDs in using digital technologies through campaigns and training programmes. These initiatives specifically targeted older people to improve their familiarity and proficiency with digital tools

  • Supporting the establishment of “internet hospitals” to mobilise healthcare resources into digital platforms with easy navigation and integration between online services and community based services

Tackling barriers to digital assimilation

  • Creating supportive ecosystems for deeper engagement with technologies: introduced the “Internet Plus” initiative in 2015, with encouragement of investment, research, and development of digital ecosystems

  • Issuing policies and guidelines, such as “Guiding opinions on promoting information accessibility” and “Action plan for supporting easy transformation of internet applications among the elderly,” with aims to support older adults in obtaining and using internet application information in an equal and convenient manner

  • Providing alternative solutions and promoting digital inclusion through the delivery of community based services that offer support and assistance in utilising digital technologies

  • NCD=non-communicable disease

RETURN TO TEXT

China’s efforts in narrowing the digital divide serve as an example of overcoming barriers at various levels through multisectoral efforts. Nevertheless, different countries need to tailor digital health solutions strategies to their distinct context, considering the political and culture environment, healthcare system structure, and so on. Thus, no “one size fits all” solution exists for tackling the digital divide globally. Moreover, acknowledging that digital health is not a “panacea” for every challenge confronting healthcare systems in the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases is essential. Instead, we view digital health solutions as useful tools for overcoming these challenges to achieve a more cost effective and sustainable impact on health outcomes.

Ways forward to maximise the benefit of digital health solutions

To harness the power of digital health solutions for prevention and control of non-communicable diseases, actions are needed from all stakeholders, including both public and private sectors and multi-sectorial partnerships, to improve equitable reach, enhance effectiveness, and promote holistic integration. Firstly, we need to acknowledge the existence and significance of the digital divide in non-communicable diseases and health disparities, assess its current extent, and formulate tailored strategies.

Secondly, we should improve the effectiveness of digital health solutions. Involving healthcare providers, researchers, and potential consumers, especially those from socially deprived groups, in the development stage can enhance the credibility, equal adoption, and suitability of digital health solutions. This can increase the direct benefit for service users. Attention should also be given to the spillover effects on non-users, such as families or peers of users, who may benefit from digital health solutions through social contagions and shared behaviour change strategies. Such spillover effects have the potential to mitigate the negative impact of the digital divide.

Thirdly, seamless integration and better penetration of digital health solutions within the healthcare and community ecosystem can benefit individuals, communities, and societies as a whole in monitoring and control of non-communicable diseases. Strategies should combine a top down approach shaped by regional, national, and local policies, alongside a bottom up approach driven by consumer groups and private sectors. Further research on implementation is needed to translate these recommendations into practice, along with other concerns surrounding digital health solutions such as confidentiality, security, open sharing, cost, and regulatory factors, either in general or for non-communicable disease management in particular.

Conclusion

The digital divide, far from being solely a social problem, represents a pressing health concern that demands urgent actions. That we might never eliminate the digital divide simply by enabling the accessibility of technologies for everyone or ensuring internet connectivity in every corner of the globe seems inevitable. Rather, greater emphasis should be placed on harnessing a collective and more equitable power of digital health solutions, especially for vulnerable populations untouched by the digital world. Through fostering a society valuing effective technology and humanity, we can improve health for all.

Key messages

  • The rapid and uneven global trend of digitisation highlights a pervasive challenge of digital divide, encompassing limitations in digital access, digital literacy, and digital assimilation

  • Existing disparities in non-communicable disease outcomes may be exacerbated if effective digital health solutions are unevenly distributed; this impact on health inequity exists at individual, institutional, and societal levels

  • Efforts have been made in China to narrow the extent of the digital divide by tackling different levels of barriers, which exemplify practical strategies for other countries

  • To harness the power of digital health solutions and promote prevention and control of non-communicable diseases for all, enhancing reach, extending the impact beyond users, and promoting system integration are crucial

Acknowledgments

We thank Xiaoxuan Zhang and Jia Li for their help in reviewing the literature. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No 82204171), CMB Open Competition Grant (No 22-468), and the non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (grant No 2022-ZHCH330-01). EG and LLY are also supported by project funding from the Western Pacific Regional Office of the World Health Organization (Project for harnessing digital health for NCDs).

Footnotes

  • Contributors and sources: EG and RS proposed the idea for this topic. EG and RS drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to revising the manuscript, provided intellectual input to improve the manuscript, and approved the final version. RS is the guarantor.

  • Competing interests: We have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and have no interests to declare.

  • Patient involvement: No patients were involved in this analysis. We thank participants and patients who participated in previous projects, inspiring the insights described in this analysis.

  • This article is part of a collection on chronic diseases in China funded by Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing Hospital, and the authors and their institutions. The BMJ commissioned, peer reviewed, edited, and made the decisions to publish these articles. The lead editors for The BMJ were Jin-Ling Tang and Di Wang.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

References