Switching from inhaled to intravenous general anaesthesia
BMJ 2024; 387 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-079323 (Published 02 October 2024) Cite this as: BMJ 2024;387:e079323Linked Editorial
Sustainable practice: what can I do?
- Robert Fleming, specialist anaesthetist1,
- Giovanna Kossakowska, consultant paediatric anaesthetist2,
- Aparna Trivedi, anaesthetic specialist3,
- Cliff Shelton, consultant anaesthetist, professor34
- 1Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Mansfield, UK
- 2Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester
- 3Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester
- 4Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster
- Correspondence to: C Shelton Cliff.Shelton{at}nhs.net
What you need to know
Inhalational anaesthetic agents are greenhouse gases; total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) usually has a lower carbon footprint, and avoids greenhouse gas emission at the point of use
TIVA has clinical benefits over inhalational anaesthesia in the early postoperative phase, but there is equipoise regarding major complications
Switching to TIVA relies on staff expertise, equipment availability, and medication supply
Safety checklists such as Peruse Before You Infuse can help to standardise equipment setup and avoid error
Inhalational and intravenous medications can be used to induce and maintain general anaesthesia. In recent years, the use of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) has increased.1 Although both techniques are safe, TIVA has some clinical and environmental benefits when compared with inhalational anaesthesia.
Why change is needed
The “triad of anaesthesia,” comprising unconsciousness, analgesia, and immobility, is typically achieved with hypnotics and analgesics, with or without muscle relaxants. Inhalational anaesthetic agents are greenhouse gases; volatiles (eg, sevoflurane, desflurane) persist in the atmosphere for up to 21 years; nitrous oxide (an analgesic and sedative) persists for more than 100 years. Inhaled anaesthetic agents are estimated to account for up to 3% of total national healthcare greenhouse gas emissions in high income countries, and between 0.01% and 0.1% of greenhouse gas emissions overall.2
Inhalational anaesthesia has an impressive safety profile and some valuable clinical uses (eg, induction of anaesthesia in patients without intravenous access), but is also associated with postoperative nausea and vomiting, can trigger malignant hyperthermia in susceptible patients, and staff working in operating theatres risk occupational exposure. TIVA, typically based on propofol (a hypnotic agent) and an opioid such as remifentanil, offers a smooth and rapid return of consciousness, which may have implications for patient satisfaction and recovery, and is preferable in situations when ventilation may have to be interrupted (eg, during “tubeless field” airway surgery). Although each technique …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.